Accident at work

Trethowans were instructed by Mrs Bowers to pursue a personal injury claim on her behalf after she developed a repetitive strain injury to her wrist at work.

Background

Mrs Bowers was employed by a company who produced electronic circuits and components. She worked on the assembly line and carried out manual tasks such as cutting / snipping circuit boards, soldering, potting (mixing, weighing etc), wire cutting, screwing parts together and other aspects of general mechanical assembly.  All of these tasks were carried out by hand. She had to use both hands for intricate work which required fine motor skills.  She also had to apply pressure from her hands/wrists (particularly in relation to cutting and soldering) as it was necessary to hold materials firmly in place at all times.

The work was physically demanding and extremely repetitive.  She would often spend days at a time performing the same task.

Medical problems

Mrs Bowers became aware of problems with her wrist.  She was signed off work and diagnosed as suffering with tendonitis.  She was informed that this was caused by the repetitive nature of her machine assembly work.  Upon her return to work she made repeated requests to her employer for steps to be taken to reduce the risk of her condition being aggravated, including the provision new equipment (e.g. new cutters to use at work) and being removed from certain tasks that aggravated her condition. No changes were implemented by her employers. She continued to work, however her condition deteriorated further, eventually rendering her unable to continue. 

She was reviewed by her employer's occupational health advisor. He recommended that new cutters be purchased for her (but this was never done).  After a second assessment he diagnosed that she had developed complex regional pain syndrome and he noted that her grip strength was significantly reduced.  He concluded that she would not be able to return to her previous employment on account of her condition and persisting symptoms. 

Liability and causation

This matter was initially presented to the Defendant (Mrs Bowers' employers) who instructed solicitors to defend the case.  Issues of both liability and causation were firmly disputed by the Defendant from the outset.

The case raised difficult and complex issues in terms of both liability and causation. It was necessary to try and prove on Mrs Bowers' behalf that:

1. There was a foreseeable risk of injury occurring due to the repetitive and physical  nature of the work that she carried out; and that her employers were aware of this  risk and should have taken reasonable steps to minimise the risk as far as possible.

2. Mrs Bowers' condition / injuries had been caused directly by the repetitive and physical nature of the duties she was ordered to perform at work.

On the first point (liability), it was necessary to obtain expert evidence from an ergonomic expert, to comment on issues of manual handling and whether the tasks she was performing at work did expose Mrs Bowers to a foreseeable risk of injury.  The Defendant initially objected to the involvement of such an expert and declined to agree joint instructions. We proceeded to obtain the expert evidence regardless, and in due course the Defendant eventually decided to obtain a separate report from their own ergonomic expert.

The conduct of the Defendant at various stages created problems in dealing with the case. Significant difficulties were encountered when a joint site visit was arranged to enable both parties and the ergonomic experts to view the assembly area and assess the tasks being carried out.  Mrs Bowers     was refused access to the site visit by the Defendant. This caused difficulties our ergonomic expert as he was denied Mrs Bowers' input in terms of evaluating the information obtained during the site visit.  There were also issues regarding disclosure of documents held by the Defendant, which were not disclosed to us, which again hindered the expert's progress.

The second issue (causation) necessitated the instruction of a medical expert.  A Consultant Rheumatologist was instructed and a detailed medical report was obtained.  Subsequently, the expert advised further both in meetings and by way of responding to written questions that were put to him.  The Defendant again chose to instruct their own medical expert, although his report / evidence was never disclosed to us.

Court proceedings

Due to the Defendant's continued denial of liability, it was necessary to start court proceedings.  The Defendant responded to the service of court proceedings by repeating their previous denials of liability and causation.  They later amended their Defence.  This necessitated further work and we submitted a formal Reply to the Defence on Mrs Bowers' behalf.

The Court allocated to the multi-track.  The Claimant and Defendant were each given permission to rely on their own Ergonomic and Rheumatology experts.  The expert evidence is discussed further below.

Case Management Conference

A Case Management Conference was held in Court on 12 March 2013.  The Defendant had been reluctant to disclose particular documentation which had been repeatedly requested by us.  In Court The District Judge made an order for the information requested to be provided to us.  In addition, Mrs Bowers  was given permission to obtain a further ergonomic report, in order to comment upon the additional documents and information that the Defendant had so far failed to show to us.  Both parties were also given permission by the Court to put questions to the experts.  A joint ergonomic statement was then to be produced by the experts.

In relation to the medical evidence, The Defendant was ordered to disclose their medical report, and Mrs Bowers was given permission to obtain an updated rheumatology report from our own medical expert.  A joint rheumatology statement was to be produced in due course.

Finally, we also succeeded in persuading the court to allow Mrs Bowers     to obtain a separate medical report from a Consultant Psychologist, to address the psychological injuries that she had suffered as a result of the development of the condition in her wrist.

Witness Evidence

Given the Defendant’s denial of liability, it was necessary to obtain extremely detailed witness statements from Mrs Bowers herself and from several of her former work colleagues who had also experienced similar problems during their employment with the Defendant. 

Offers / Settlement

Despite their continued denial of liability, the Defendant made an initial offer of settlement, once the court proceedings had been started.  Their initial offer was to pay £5,000 to Mrs Bowers in respect of her damages (this figure included both compensation for her injuries, pain and suffering, together with re-imbursement of her associated financial losses).  This offer was rejected on Mrs Bowers' behalf as it was clearly insufficient.

The case continued and the court fixed dates for a further Case Management Conference and also listed the matter for a 4 day Trial.
 
The Defendant did not wish to go to Trial and eventually increased their offer to £25,000 in respect of total damages. In addition, they offered to pay Mrs Bowers' legal costs in full.  This offer was eventually accepted by Mrs Bowers, upon our advice.

At the end of the case, Mrs Bowers said “I’m so grateful for all the time and effort Trethowans invested in my case. They offered me constant help support and understanding when I was at my lowest ebb. Every member of the team at Trethowans have shown me compassion every step of the way, helping me over every hurdle – with the result being a successful case and my emotional well-being restored”.

Meet the team

Clare Carter
Partner
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426936
07500 935 695
Personal Injury
John Hall
Partner & Head of Occupational Disease
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8082 0526
07881 343953
Personal Injury
Tom Hartigan
Partner
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426969
07917 272 373
Personal Injury
Gavin Lane
Partner & Head of Personal Injury Group
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8082 0535
07884 184 681
Personal Injury
Chris Whiteley
Managing Partner
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426921
07884 184 580
Personal Injury
James Braund
Senior Associate - Personal Injury Solicitor in Poole
Personal Injury
Poole
01202 339014
07887 525 415
Personal Injury
Rhiannon Daniel
Senior Associate
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426923
07879 448 632
Personal Injury
Frances Gillett
Associate
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426956
07880 712459
Personal Injury
Sarah Mills
Consultant
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8032 0405
07801 577120
Personal Injury
Laura Rowe
Solicitor
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8082 0537
Personal Injury
James Gleisner
Chartered Legal Executive
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8082 0465
Personal Injury
Katherine Knapman
Paralegal
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426925
07881 343 962
Personal Injury
Adele Martin
Paralegal
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426975
Personal Injury
Charlotte Harwood
Trainee Solicitor
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426983
Personal Injury
Alison Hutchings
Medical Records Nurse Assessor
Personal Injury
Southampton
+44 (0) 23 8082 0474
Personal Injury
Joan Ferrett
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Southampton
02380 820541
Personal Injury
Amy Gregory
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Southampton
023 8082 0538
Personal Injury
Anna Hagan
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426918
Personal Injury
Lorraine Morrissey
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426931
Personal Injury
Claire Parrett
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426987
Personal Injury
Pamela Perry
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Salisbury
01722 426931
Personal Injury
Tanya Reeves
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Poole
01202 339031
Personal Injury
Eleanor Churchill
Legal Secretary
Personal Injury
Southampton
02380 820521
Personal Injury